McConnell: White House offer to cut $6B is 'unserious'

by Guest Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:32 pm

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Friday that the White House's opening offer to cut an additional $6 billion in spending is "unserious."

"The Democrats' whole approach is to see what they can get away with, rather than to actually do something about the debt and jobs crisis Americans want us to address," he said. "The White House proposal yesterday is equally unserious."

McConnell: White House offer to cut $6B is 'unserious' 86524

Is "unserious" a real word?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/147481-mcconnell-wh-offer-to-cut-6b-is-unserious?utm_campaign=briefingroom&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterfeed

by gettheminNOVEMBER Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:35 pm

HE JUST SPENT 350 BILLION on tax breaks for the rich Frustrated

I think he only uses half his brain. The UNSERIOUS SIDE! lol!

by TR11005 Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:19 pm

Time to go to Washington DC, with pitchforks! CNN just said the 99ers have a right to be angry. Workers that have been out with less weeks are finding the jobs. Where we are being ignored!!! The Inhumanity of it all! McConnell: White House offer to cut $6B is 'unserious' 806957

McConnell: White House offer to cut $6B is 'unserious' 806957

by Guest Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:27 pm

TR11005 wrote: Time to go to Washington DC, with pitchforks! CNN just said the 99ers have a right to be angry. Workers that have been out with less weeks are finding the jobs. Where we are being ignored!!! The Inhumanity of it all!

Thank you CNN! At least someone is telling the truth!
McConnell: White House offer to cut $6B is 'unserious' 907995

by chopthis91 Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:37 pm

"Workers that have been out with less weeks are finding the jobs."

They are? That's not true either!! People out of work longer than 6 months have an increasingly hard time finding work!!

MAD

by Guest Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:43 pm

While McConnell is offering to slash another $6 billion, why doesn't he introduce a spending package for the long term unemployed?

by TR11005 Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:17 pm

I meant to say the more recent unemployed are finding the jobs. Where the 99ers are having difficulty. That sucks worse. Where they did it in a few weeks, where 2 years is not enough. Sound like discrimination to me.